5 ms·
The only way I'd accept one of these hanging on my wall was if it had computer vision to check & verify that there's nobody in the room before it starts that go
by floren 7y ago
The only way I'd accept one of these hanging on my wall was if it had computer vision to check & verify that there's nobody in the room before it starts that god-awful flickery 25 second update process. Eurgh.
- Wowfunhappy 7y agoOh come now, if it updated oncer per day, that's 25 seconds of flicker per 86,375 seconds of viewing. And you could set it to update at 2am when everyone is asleep. (Computer vision would be cool though, imagine if it was different every time you left and re-entered a room?)
- kalleboo 7y agoHumans are pretty perceptive of things flickering in the periphery of their vision, especially when they happen only rarely (as opposed to, say, xmas tree lights). That said, you could probably put a one-cell LCD (like those shadeable windows on the 787) over the screen to black it out during the update.
- cnasc 7y agoSomeone did something like this with a torn-apart 5k iMac, mounting the display in a gilded frame and having it cycle through various images of fine art but only when the camera determined that nobody was looking at it. https://www.claybavor.com/blog/a-canvas-made-of-pixels https://www.claybavor.com/blog/a-canvas-made-of-pixels
- jmiserez 7y ago>A fun (but impractical and frustrating) variant of this feature is to have the image change as soon as the viewer looks away. So you’re looking at a painting, glance away to another room, and look back to find a new painting hanging on the wall. Also interesting that the iMac doesn't have TrueTone, so he had to do the white-balance matching himself.