I came to complain about the graphs... Their 38%s don't line up; like at all. Also, they don't go into what they mean by "unlabeled" in either the current met

I came to complain about the graphs... Their 38%s don't line up; like at all. Also, they don't go into what they mean by "unlabeled" in either the current methodology or their previously linked North Korea methodology either for how the people selected where Iran was. With the datapoints on the map, I'm wondering if they even had country borders; otherwise I'd think a heatmap of the selected countries would be a better telling of the data. In general, their visual representations of what was produced was, in short, hot freaking garbage. Which may mean that the data is; and kinda throws the entire survey into question.