4 ms·
Was this bug introduced in a recent version or is it old? I tried clicking through to see the bug, but I'm "not authorized". Edit2: never mind the old edit, lm
by sp332 7y ago
Was this bug introduced in a recent version or is it old? I tried clicking through to see the bug, but I'm "not authorized".
Edit2: never mind the old edit, lmkg has a good point about the age of the CVE.
- hannibalhorn 7y agoGiven it affects the ESR release, I suspect it's been around a while. More details would be indeed be nice!
- lmkg 7y ago> The CVE was created last September, so it was known about at least that long Mozilla could have reserved CVE numbers in blocks, and still be allocating from that batch.
- gruez 7y agoIs there a reason why an organization would continue to use CVE numbers from last year?
- callmejonas 7y agoCVE are assigned from the year the vulnerability was found. Not when it was announced. However, a CNA like Firefox does not allocate CVE as they need them. They first ask Mitre for a block of X CVE to use as they need. They probably got a new block in September.