> his reasoning is er.. reasonable Is it? Was the question about how acceptable would "veal" be as a name implying that it would not be acceptable at all? What

> his reasoning is er.. reasonable Is it? Was the question about how acceptable would "veal" be as a name implying that it would not be acceptable at all? What about “lamb”? Or “pork”? (PORK is the long-awaited Well-Done BEEF, according to https://www.cs.cmu.edu/afs/cs/project/ozone/www/object-systems/pork.html https://www.cs.cmu.edu/afs/cs/project/ozone/www/object-syste...) By the way, there is also https://beefproject.com/ https://beefproject.com/