5 ms·

>Secure >8 year old Intel Processors full of CPU bugs I don't get how you can call this secure. Without those CPU's it certainly would be an interesting device

by kitani 7y ago

>Secure >8 year old Intel Processors full of CPU bugs I don't get how you can call this secure. Without those CPU's it certainly would be an interesting device. But advertising it as secure and then using something like Qubes where those bugs break the very isolation Qubes is based upon ...

szszszsz 7y ago
As far as I see Qubes 4.x is protected from most of the CPU attacks [1][2] since over a year. Do you have anything particular in mind? Disclaimer: I work with Nitrokey. PS Due to comments' post limit my replies might be delayed. [1] https://www.qubes-os.org/news/2018/01/11/qsb-37/ https://www.qubes-os.org/news/2018/01/11/qsb-37/ [2] https://github.com/QubesOS/qubes-issues/issues/4262 https://github.com/QubesOS/qubes-issues/issues/4262