4 ms·
A well-developed statistical model should be able to take that into account. My understanding is that the academic consensus is fairly strongly leaning towards
by funklute 7y ago
A well-developed statistical model should be able to take that into account. My understanding is that the academic consensus is fairly strongly leaning towards nuclear being the safest energy option, based on robust statistical models. Would be interested in hearing the opinions on this from someone actually in this academic field though...
- dv_dt 7y agoA model could provide an estimate there, but nuclear deaths are not estimated that way from the posted source. They are only directly attributable deaths. e.g. cherynobyl was attributed from the posted source as 7 deaths while statistical modeling puts it in at least the tens of thousands range. Even the 7 of the link is questionable as reports of firefighter deaths during the accident as 27. e.g. https://heavy.com/news/2019/05/how-many-people-died-at-chernobyl/ https://heavy.com/news/2019/05/how-many-people-died-at-chern...