3 ms·
1. Yes, I heard about them. And the point remains, as soon as their effects were discovered, they were pulled. 2. These are not vaccines, but medications. So t
by bipson 7y ago
1. Yes, I heard about them. And the point remains, as soon as their effects were discovered, they were pulled.
2. These are not vaccines, but medications. So this has virtually nothing to do with "known vaccine-induced ongoing illnesses"
- dennis_jeeves 7y ago>Yes, I heard about them. And the point remains, as soon as their effects were discovered, they were pulled. Then you have not read of Vioxx or Thalidomide in sufficient detail. There were also massive coverups (or being dismissive of reported negative effects) did you notice that when you read it? > These are not vaccines, but medications. bipson, what the point that you are trying to make? Is it that the production/administration of vaccines (but not medications) are not prone to incompetence and coverups by govt, pharma? It is not a rhetorical question.
- beagle3 7y agoWhich is the prisoner’s dilemma I mentioned earlier - if you already enjoy herd immunity, why risk being part of the group in which the problems are discovered?