4 ms·

>I need to move this odd shaped or heavy or inconvenient equipment now. Not in 5 minutes. Not in 15. No, you don't. You want to move it now, but in general, yo

>I need to move this odd shaped or heavy or inconvenient equipment now. Not in 5 minutes. Not in 15. No, you don't. You want to move it now, but in general, you don't need to move it now. > I won't tolerate your rules on what I put in the car or truck I own either. Yes, you will, or you won't drive on publicly funded roads. You are not licenced to transport nuclear waste. You are not licenced to transport explosives. You need the right vehicle to transport an heavy or insecure load. Your freedom to transport whatever you want does not supersede other peoples freedom to drive in a safe environment.

sfgweilr4f 7y ago
Well I had a inspection I had to do last week. Equipment had to be out within two days. I was available on one day. So yes, Now. Not later. Now. Where's your public transport? Perhaps a van? No. Now. I was referring to public transport rules and people's random car rules, eg Uber. But you want to enumerate toxic materials laws and assert I'm against that so you are Right and I'm Wrong in some attempt to show I'm completely unreasonable and probably kick puppies. So, Obligatory note addendum to clarify so the internet feels safe: - no, I'm not in favor of transporting unrestricted nuclear fuel in cars in icecream tubs in peoples laps while they speak on the phone and read the newspaper. - yes I want freedom to have a vehicle of my own so that an odd shaped box that wont fit in a Uber can actually be moved. - no that odd shaped box doesn't contain industrial waste. And no, I'm not an advocate for that. - yes that box complies with standard size requirements. It does not stretch out the back like a jousting lance. - having to clarify this stuff is bad. its like providing a legal document with so many clauses you forget the original point. - And yes that guy is a helicopter parent to whatever degree. - and yes, I've lost a family member to a road bicycle incident. The investigation showed that the only real way to have prevented that incident would have been to ban all road bikes. That seems unwise.

sfgweilr4f 7y ago

Well I had a inspection I had to do last week. Equipment had to be out within two days. I was available on one day. So yes, Now. Not later. Now. Where's your public transport? Perhaps a van? No. Now. I was referring to public transport rules and people's random car rules, eg Uber. But you want to enumerate toxic materials laws and assert I'm against that so you are Right and I'm Wrong in some attempt to show I'm completely unreasonable and probably kick puppies. So, Obligatory note addendum to clarify so the internet feels safe: - no, I'm not in favor of transporting unrestricted nuclear fuel in cars in icecream tubs in peoples laps while they speak on the phone and read the newspaper. - yes I want freedom to have a vehicle of my own so that an odd shaped box that wont fit in a Uber can actually be moved. - no that odd shaped box doesn't contain industrial waste. And no, I'm not an advocate for that. - yes that box complies with standard size requirements. It does not stretch out the back like a jousting lance. - having to clarify this stuff is bad. its like providing a legal document with so many clauses you forget the original point. - And yes that guy is a helicopter parent to whatever degree. - and yes, I've lost a family member to a road bicycle incident. The investigation showed that the only real way to have prevented that incident would have been to ban all road bikes. That seems unwise.