3 ms·

> relevance is bullshit Citation?

• viraptor 7y ago
  I'm not sure what you're looking for here. Fires are out of control. Have you got someone proving that fire caused by lightning could be controlled easier than fire started by arson? Basically if you claim they're relevant, it's on you to find an explanation how/why. Not on everyone else to disprove every possible theory. Otherwise we're stuck in gish gallop.
  • SlowRobotAhead 7y ago
    Well clearly this is made worse by climate change! But... You keep saying that you KNOW the arson arrests are “bullshit” when taking about this. How are you making that claim? How do you know these fires are unrelated to two dozen arrests made? Please cite that.
    • viraptor 7y ago
      You can't prove a negative. If they're connected and people have proof and it's relevant, they'd present it. And again, arson-related arrests are real and I'm not disputing them. This would not even be an interesting topic if it wasn't pushed so strongly on social media with a lot of bias. (Wasn't as interesting a decade ago when it was a firefighter starting fires) So let's do a reasonable thing and drop that whole thing until someone comes up with a credible proof, not a theory abused by bots and media.