> true in some sense. In the sense that the diets & health of ordinary people were much worse under early agriculture. This appears to have been true for a lon

> true in some sense. In the sense that the diets & health of ordinary people were much worse under early agriculture. This appears to have been true for a long time, maybe until a few centuries ago. People ran away if they could. Early agricultural societies seem more and more like attempts by warlords to enslave both animals and humans for their benefit. Capturing livestock & farmers seems to have been the main goal of warfare. > also an incredibly good deal, in that it now supports 7000 million human lives Sure, 21st century life is (for almost all of us) much better. It's not so clear that 19th C life was so (except for a few highly-developed places).