3 ms·
The wireless systems I am thinking have published latency specs of something like 3ms, for example. It’s not worth the cost for my uses so I just stick with wir
by klodolph 7y ago
The wireless systems I am thinking have published latency specs of something like 3ms, for example. It’s not worth the cost for my uses so I just stick with wires. I’m not sure which systems you are referring to that have 10ms latency, but I haven’t worked with many wireless systems so it could just be a lack of experience on my part.
https://assets.sennheiser.com/global-downloads/file/12186/SK_6212_Specifications_Manufacturer_Declarations_01_2019.pdf https://assets.sennheiser.com/global-downloads/file/12186/SK... - 3ms
https://www.shure.eu/productdocumentsfiles/default/products/wireless-receivers/glxd6/glxd6userguide-c44b67f219c0ede7f15233aba75dba5b.pdf https://www.shure.eu/productdocumentsfiles/default/products/... - 4ms
Opus can achieve reasonable lossy compression ratios with 2.5ms packet sizes using its CELT half, which uses MDCT, so it’s definitely possible to achieve high quality under these constraints. I doubt it would make sense with Bluetooth LE because of the complexity of the codec.