The title seems to be intentionally misleading, the words "no evidence" are presented as if they are a quote from the paper, while in reality the phrase "no evi

The title seems to be intentionally misleading, the words "no evidence" are presented as if they are a quote from the paper, while in reality the phrase "no evidence" appears zero times in it. Ignore the headline, read the abstract and if you have time the paper. It's much more interesting and accurately/fairly describes the data collected.