3 ms·
I thought unions were for low skilled workers that are easily replaceable. If you do this with higher level skill jobs, I think there is a strong risk of stagna
by proc0 7y ago
I thought unions were for low skilled workers that are easily replaceable. If you do this with higher level skill jobs, I think there is a strong risk of stagnating the growth of the industry by forcing companies to hire a certain way. Higher skill jobs are already in a position of good compensation and companies understand those employees are valuable. This includes programmers and such, but perhaps not artists (unfortunately). I can see a union for game artists and non-programming roles, as those would basically be lower skill level that can be easily replaced.
- bluGill 7y agoUnions are for high skill jobs where there is worker solidarity. If you are low skill your attempt to unionize will be met by strikebreakers happy to take your job. If you don't have worker solidarity you cannot unionize because those who feel they are better won't want the inability of the lesser to pull them down.