4 ms·
Is SHA1 not still faster than 256/512? And Blake2 barely faster? I suspect with some hardware SHA1 is still going to beat all of those out - am I wrong? I would
by staticassertion 7y ago
Is SHA1 not still faster than 256/512? And Blake2 barely faster? I suspect with some hardware SHA1 is still going to beat all of those out - am I wrong? I would love to learn more.
- tptacek 7y agohttps://bench.cr.yp.to/results-hash.html https://bench.cr.yp.to/results-hash.html Regardless, no competent designer is going to use SHA1.
- staticassertion 7y agoThank you, that's an excellent chart.
- __s 7y agoCRC is faster than SHA1
- mzs 7y agoIt's not about the speed, it's about the 'is it secure.'
- sicariusnoctis 7y agoIf my amazing hash function takes 10^10^10 years to compute, it's possibly more secure than anything else listed there, but it's also quite useless.