Ah, I see. I think, in all fairness to him, you express a desire for some 'journalistic' or 'interviewer' skills. I totally understand that, the greats in those

Ah, I see. I think, in all fairness to him, you express a desire for some 'journalistic' or 'interviewer' skills. I totally understand that, the greats in those fields are awesome. However I think it's a tall order to ask people in general to excel in two entirely distinct domains, especially at such a 'young' age (MIT must've taken most of his time so far). So with domain-driven people who dabble in media, we get their strong vertical at the cost of more mediocre delivery — but to me that remains sweeter than a "professional" journalist who speaks second-hand about everything, at least for most technical or complex topics. He's got time to get a lot better at interviewing, podcasting, if that's the goal. Eventually, he can be both a great AI researcher and a great podcaster. Meanwhile, I'll take it regardless because that's the best we've got now. > Has he interviewed unknown people, nobody would listen to him, IMHO. If the topic were totally irrelevant, maybe; but I have a fondness for scientists trying to speak to everyone, e.g. on YouTube / podcast / whatever, so I would still listen probably. Like that guy, Robert Miles from Cambridge who speaks of AI safety[1] — delivery wasn't great in the beginning, but damn were the topics incredible food for thought. [1]: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCLB7AzTwc6VFZrBsO2ucBMg https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCLB7AzTwc6VFZrBsO2ucBMg