3 ms·
That's a really schizophrenic argument. On the one hand because they are this large, they cannot currate content. On the other hand they are arguing because th
by nocturnial 7y ago
That's a really schizophrenic argument.
On the one hand because they are this large, they cannot currate content. On the other hand they are arguing because they are this large they are the only ones who can currate this content.
I would feel more sympathetic to your argument if the companies wouldn't argue both cases at the same time.
- deleted 7y ago[deleted]
- NotATroll 7y ago> I would feel more sympathetic to your argument if the companies wouldn't argue both cases at the same time. I don't really care about sympathy, so much as I care about reality. The companies will do as all companies do. Try to make money by garnering confidence in their product & abilities. Even if they have to lie through their teeth. Reality is, there isn't a good system (currently) to really curate massive amounts of user submitted video content, in an environment where anyone anywhere can submit said video content. The problem's scale is always going to lead towards either a compromise of being an open video platform, or a compromise in relation to curation.