"high order thinking" appears to be loose, metaphorical reasoning; or partial-information where a lot isn't explicitly stated, but assumed, or extrapolated (Pra

"high order thinking" appears to be loose, metaphorical reasoning; or partial-information where a lot isn't explicitly stated, but assumed, or extrapolated (Pragmatic? Speculative?) - but that relies heavily on correlation too, and I find the distinction is hard to outline. It also dinstinguished facts by "topic relevance" i.e a less-relevant fact may require more speculation; However this ignore resolution - how accurate, and/or generalised a given fact is in the first place. Finally, any corrolation/speculation can be tainted when you include an uneven mix, or cherry-picked slection, of facts to be informed by which isn't handled when we start catagorising individual facts, rather than collections of facts as a whole.