Right, especially after a "squash", which seems to be the standard way to merge branches in the companies I've been working with recently. (Which is, ironically

Right, especially after a "squash", which seems to be the standard way to merge branches in the companies I've been working with recently. (Which is, ironically, also the way Subversion merges branches. With the exception that "svn blame -g" will go into the commits which were squashed if you want. An option which doesn't exist after a "squash" on Git.)