2 ms·
At least for Premiere it's not as useful as you'd think: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=StJssAQZlZc&t=38s https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=StJssAQZlZc&t=38s (a
by SCdF 7y ago
At least for Premiere it's not as useful as you'd think: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=StJssAQZlZc&t=38s https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=StJssAQZlZc&t=38s
(at least for now, I don't work in that industry but it may just be a code quality issue)
- BubRoss 7y agoffmpeg is a much better way to look at video encoding. Codec libraries themselves have varying ability to use multiple cores effectively.
- dragontamer 7y agoTwitch / "Influencer" video gamers aren't using Premiere for videos. Twitch streamers need a "streaming" solution. They play live, and instantly react to the crowd. If someone pays for an emote or something, the Twitch-streamer is expected to look on camera and say thank you to the donor (and maybe repeat the message that the donor paid for). This means that a Twitch streamer's computer MUST encode the gameplay live. Traditionally, Twitch streamers would buy two computers, one to play video games, and a 2nd computer to process the video stream and upload it to Twitch. With the advent of 16+ core computers, Twitch streamers have begun to simply buy one computer, lock 8-cores to the video game, and then lock 8-cores to the Twitch encoder. Presumably, something like a Threadripper (24+ cores) could process the video stream for better quality and lower bandwidth. Maybe live VP9 encoding, for example (8-cores for the video game, 16-cores or more for the encoder)