As far as I can tell, Quanta Magazine article does mention the original post findings. Additionally, the Quanta article and the findings preprint were published

As far as I can tell, Quanta Magazine article does mention the original post findings. Additionally, the Quanta article and the findings preprint were published just a week apart. Not enough time to formulate a good response: * Quanta Magazine article: 17 Dec 2019 * Arxiv preprint: 10 Dec 2019 [1] CMB and BAO are mentioned in the original post too: > Other cosmological probes, such as the cosmic microwave background (CMB) and baryonic acoustic oscillations (BAO), are also known to provide some indirect and "circumstantial" evidence for dark energy, but it was recently suggested that CMB from Planck mission no longer supports the concordance cosmological model which may require new physics (Di Valentino, Melchiorri, & Silk 2019). Some investigators have also shown that BAO and other low-redshift cosmological probes can be consistent with a non-accelerating universe without dark energy (see, for example, Tutusaus et al. 2017). In this respect, the present result showing the luminosity evolution mimicking dark energy in SN cosmology is crucial and very timely. [1]: https://arxiv.org/abs/1912.04903 https://arxiv.org/abs/1912.04903