3 ms·

> how would you prove the inverse of this? I don't know, but that alone isn't a convincing argument. > ...ads that would nudge them to a certain political can

> how would you prove the inverse of this? I don't know, but that alone isn't a convincing argument. > ...ads that would nudge them to a certain political candidate > ...that's where most of the presential election fund raises go to... Perhaps. The question is, what is the effect? I would wager it is very small to nil.

nojvek 7y ago
As nil as Coca-Cola’s billboard/tv marketing ? When I still had FB, their ads/propaganda was super convincing about Hillary and her hacked email server yada yada. It was quite a genius marketing method to reach millions.