3 ms·
Cherry picking unlikely hypothetical scenarios (this is GR, not yelp) is a bad strategy for making a binary determination of the morality of a choice. When you
by jshevek 7y ago
Cherry picking unlikely hypothetical scenarios (this is GR, not yelp) is a bad strategy for making a binary determination of the morality of a choice.
When you ask "Was that the morally superior choice", what set of options are you considering? In my prior statement, I simply claimed that it can be argued that doing nothing is morally superior to abusing the voting system.
- 6181F056 7y ago"It can be argued" is a completely vacuous statement. Anything can be argued. Your comparison to Yelp is equally specious because Goodreads is not the endangered party -- it's the author. Given the attacks happening, their livelihood is already threatened. So your hypothetical pacifism re: the sanctity of the voting system only guarantees the attackers will win.