> Lastly, the costs - as Khosla mentioned the beach is unprofitable to run It's a beach. Why does it have to be profitable? > should CA be footing that bill?

> Lastly, the costs - as Khosla mentioned the beach is unprofitable to run It's a beach. Why does it have to be profitable? > should CA be footing that bill? You mean for cleanup and maintenance? Sure, why not? If Californians what their beaches, then their tax dollars should be taking care of them.