3 ms·
Well, 300 million people are currently living under an administration whose election was most likely heavily influenced by mass data collection and analysis. N
by blackbrokkoli 7y ago
Well, 300 million people are currently living under an administration whose election was most likely heavily influenced by mass data collection and analysis.
Nobody cares if you and your friend read each others diaries or whatever. The problem is the metaphorical diary being owned by a global entity, along with two billion other diaries. Locked behind shoddy security and regarded as sellable for the right price at any point in time.
As a German I was thoroughly (and rightfully IMO) teached to treat the opinion of "haha personally I just don't look further than a few meters beyond my nose and the world looks quite fine now" as danger, not as an excuse and your statement are falls quite clearly in that category. Just because you don't see nothing doesn't mean nothing is happening.
- bart_spoon 7y ago> 300 million people are currently living under an administration whose election was most likely heavily influenced by mass data collection and analysis There’s has been little to no evidence any of the data collection/analysis done by the Trump campaign influenced anyone.
- scarejunba 7y agoIt doesn't have to be sellable and it doesn't have to be shoddy security. Those don't come inherently with the product. Nothing inherently wrong with mass data collection and analysis and nothing inherently wrong with an election being heavily influenced by that. If there were falsehoods advertised then the problem is the falsehoods.