3 ms·
C++
by leon_ 16y ago
C++
- j_baker 16y agoYou do not speak C++ fluently. If you did, you would know that ++C is faster in some circumstances and is generally to be preferred. :-)
- cperciva 16y agoActually, C++ is more likely to be faster than ++C, since C++ allows for greater instruction-level parallelism (the increment can be done later rather than being part of the critical path).
- j_baker 16y agoHrm... I suppose the C++ FAQ lied to me: http://www.parashift.com/c++-faq-lite/operator-overloading.html#faq-13.15 http://www.parashift.com/c++-faq-lite/operator-overloading.h...
- kqueue 16y agoThat has absolutely nothing to do with the language.
- j_baker 16y agoIt was a joke (and judging by the reaction, apparently not a good one).