4 ms·

Based on your requirements, I think you would be able to withdraw the cash from the bank, put it into a briefcase and sink it to the bottom of the ocean in some

Based on your requirements, I think you would be able to withdraw the cash from the bank, put it into a briefcase and sink it to the bottom of the ocean in some "accident" :) You are right it's technically illegal to willingly deface currency, like melting pennies for copper. Another idea is to find someone who will sell you something at face value, that they also acquired for face value, such as silver bars or copper bars or something of that nature. In that scenario, the person who originally sold the metal to the guy who sells it to you will have made a profit, but not a very big one after accounting for the expense they went through to obtain it. This is one way I can think of that avoids the technical illegality of defacing currency. But I would definitely put the cash in a shredder or burn it. It will be quite difficult to prove what you did with the cash-- you can just say you spent it on consumable goods like food, drinks, vacations, blah blah :)

thrwaway69 7y ago
would it be for millions or even billions? I feel like that last option would attract attention soon. Not sure how legal would it be to buy a block of potentially more valuable land and put nuclear waste on it both paid by your money? I guess, other ideas include paying selective group more and target loans for risk taking behavior causing holes in a small economic country by creating instability and inequality. Maybe pay people to pollute their land? Marketing to make people unhealthier and reduce their life expectancy or invest in scams/drugs? Although all of those seems less direct and depends on generating negative value to counter the spread of money.
- quaquaqua1 7y ago
  It's a strange and interesting thought. Buying silver with your cash and then sinking it to the bottom of the ocean would definitely destroy economic value. Silver is used for producing goods and protecting against inflation. If you start destroying silver faster than the world is producing it, you will measure your economic impact by the rise in price of silver, since you reduced the supply. It currently isn't illegal to destroy silver, but the US govt has made laws in the past regarding the confiscation of silver in times of scarcity. Putting nuclear waste on land, specifically useful land like manhattan or etc would also destroy economic value and also be highly, highly illegal :) It would desttoy money and make people's lives hard, because they would have to spend money to relocate away from all the nuclear waste. Skyscrapers and tunnels would become worthless as there's no reason to go near them anymore. Convincing people to give you money in a scam also destroys economic value because they are not getting anything in return for their money sent to you :) Ultimately, the world economy is built on labor and resources. If you destroy resources and also make it impossible for people to perform labor, then you've destroyed value, measured in dollars :)
  - thrwaway69 7y ago
    Interesting case about silver. What if someone wants ethical disposal of the money? One idea I could think of is funding legal euthanasia (where it's allowed). That should be 'ethical' and cost economically more in the long term disposing value you invested. Human life in UK for example costs about 2-4 million dollars.

thrwaway69 7y ago

would it be for millions or even billions? I feel like that last option would attract attention soon. Not sure how legal would it be to buy a block of potentially more valuable land and put nuclear waste on it both paid by your money? I guess, other ideas include paying selective group more and target loans for risk taking behavior causing holes in a small economic country by creating instability and inequality. Maybe pay people to pollute their land? Marketing to make people unhealthier and reduce their life expectancy or invest in scams/drugs? Although all of those seems less direct and depends on generating negative value to counter the spread of money.

quaquaqua1 7y ago
It's a strange and interesting thought. Buying silver with your cash and then sinking it to the bottom of the ocean would definitely destroy economic value. Silver is used for producing goods and protecting against inflation. If you start destroying silver faster than the world is producing it, you will measure your economic impact by the rise in price of silver, since you reduced the supply. It currently isn't illegal to destroy silver, but the US govt has made laws in the past regarding the confiscation of silver in times of scarcity. Putting nuclear waste on land, specifically useful land like manhattan or etc would also destroy economic value and also be highly, highly illegal :) It would desttoy money and make people's lives hard, because they would have to spend money to relocate away from all the nuclear waste. Skyscrapers and tunnels would become worthless as there's no reason to go near them anymore. Convincing people to give you money in a scam also destroys economic value because they are not getting anything in return for their money sent to you :) Ultimately, the world economy is built on labor and resources. If you destroy resources and also make it impossible for people to perform labor, then you've destroyed value, measured in dollars :)
- thrwaway69 7y ago
  Interesting case about silver. What if someone wants ethical disposal of the money? One idea I could think of is funding legal euthanasia (where it's allowed). That should be 'ethical' and cost economically more in the long term disposing value you invested. Human life in UK for example costs about 2-4 million dollars.