4 ms·
Is Qt sufficient? I think it does a great job of native behaviours on macOS (certainly better than Electron). LiteIDE is a fast, native, FOSS IDE for Go: https
by mappu 7y ago
Is Qt sufficient? I think it does a great job of native behaviours on macOS (certainly better than Electron).
LiteIDE is a fast, native, FOSS IDE for Go: https://github.com/visualfc/liteide/releases/tag/x36.2 https://github.com/visualfc/liteide/releases/tag/x36.2
It supports highlighting, autocompletion, jump to definition, refactoring, cgo, vet, etc for both module and non-module projects.
I use this on Windows and Linux and prefer it over vscode - the tooling integration always seem to work more reliably for me,
- pcr910303 7y agoNah, Qt isn't; It's much better than electron (where nothing is consistent) but it's still distinguishable with it's non cocoa-text fields. I remember being annoyed that my custom keybindings in textfields don't work for some Qt based app.
- mappu 7y ago(This seems to be https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-393 https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-393 ).