Yes, it's disturbing how the submitter entirely ignores the possibility of users who have telemetry disabled, as if it is not even a possibility. Since 3% is st

Yes, it's disturbing how the submitter entirely ignores the possibility of users who have telemetry disabled, as if it is not even a possibility. Since 3% is still too high for his agenda, he then begins throwing unwarranted conjectures that most of those 3% use a `user.js` against their own volition. In fact, it seems obvious that this is a highly biased sample and probably in the other direction, at that. It seems a reasonable assumption that people who have turned off telemetry are those that would be more likely to use a `user.js` file.