4 ms·
I doubt that it's 3% of users, I have user.js and also disabled telemetry. I would suspect there is not small amount of people who have both user.js and telemet
by gray_-_wolf 7y ago
I doubt that it's 3% of users, I have user.js and also disabled telemetry. I would suspect there is not small amount of people who have both user.js and telemetry disabled same as me...
- feanaro 7y agoYes, it's disturbing how the submitter entirely ignores the possibility of users who have telemetry disabled, as if it is not even a possibility. Since 3% is still too high for his agenda, he then begins throwing unwarranted conjectures that most of those 3% use a `user.js` against their own volition. In fact, it seems obvious that this is a highly biased sample and probably in the other direction, at that. It seems a reasonable assumption that people who have turned off telemetry are those that would be more likely to use a `user.js` file.
- Polylactic_acid 7y agoTbh if you disable telemetry you don't really get to complain that your usage didn't get considered when you explicitly refused to tell Mozilla which features you use.
- CamJN 7y agoIn that case Mozilla doesn't get to market themselves as giving a shit about privacy.
- Polylactic_acid 7y agoTelemetry done right is not privacy invasive. There is nothing wrong with them seeing a count saying x% of users use this feature.