5 ms·
IPad 2.0: Can Faster, Thinner, Lighter Compete with Android Tablets?
- smoody 16y agowow. it is amazing how little content that article contains. i've noticed that a few sites like mashable, RWW, TC, and a couple of others are generating content that is nearly devoid of content. don't mean to put down you linking to the article. it's good to know that wsj has the inside scoop, but they had absolutely nothing to add.
- phlux 16y agoTC is doing so because they are trying to produce more and more "pieces of content" to map to the AOL plan to have X "pieces of content" so that in the next few months arrington can get a promotion to VP of content or some BS at AOL. it's all about quantity now.
- rwwmike 16y agoWSJ had "the inside scoop"? Really? An entire story based on the fact that the next iPad is going to be lighter, faster and thinner? That's the silly part.
- laujen 16y agoCould this article be any more biased. It talks as if rumors are facts and then positions itself as if Android tablets are currently the market leader. Last I checked it is Android devices trying to keep up with the iPad. There is one Android tablet shipping today and its sales are "smooth." The next one coming out will be considered $300 more than the iPad. I expect more from RWW. Too many good people working there to write junk like this.
- rwwmike 16y agoBiased? As in not completely accepting of the idea that everything Apple does automatically wins? You "expect more from RWW"? Really?
- dagw 16y agoNot that I disagree with your assessment as such, but there are several Android tablets currently shipping. Even if you ignore the $100 no-name pads, Creative, Archos, Viewsonic, and Huawei are all shipping Android tablets that cost less than the iPad and are usable, even if they can't compare to the iPad.