2 ms·
It may be fascist, it may not be, but what he's arguing in that piece isn't strictly wrong. Representative democracy has largely failed, and, like Thiel said, i
by kick 7y ago
It may be fascist, it may not be, but what he's arguing in that piece isn't strictly wrong. Representative democracy has largely failed, and, like Thiel said, is incompatible with maximum freedom. However, whether maximum freedom is desirable (I don't think it is) is up to the reader.
- monocasa 7y ago> Representative democracy has largely failed [citation needed] Also I love how all the people here arguibg that Thiel isn't a fascist, are simultaneously agreeeing that democracy was a mistake.
- kick 7y agohttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Republic#United_States https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Republic#United_States Failure is the right word for indirect democracy, which is also known as representative democracy. Every terrible President in the past fifty years hasn't been elected by popular vote, representative democracies enable gerrymandering, and direct democracy has been shown repeatedly to have none of these problems. See: Switzerland.
- monocasa 7y agoA) posting the United States paragraph of the republic wiki article has to be the laziest argument I've seen in a long while. B) Switzerland is very much a representative democracy still.