2 ms·
I wouldn't call 25% an outlier. Also, that's only people he knows. The numbers from interviewing.io (Aline Lerner) suggest that interview performance is arbitra
by ScottFree 7y ago
I wouldn't call 25% an outlier. Also, that's only people he knows. The numbers from interviewing.io (Aline Lerner) suggest that interview performance is arbitrary[0] and that engineers are bad at gauging their own interview performance[1]. The numbers suggest it's far more common than just 25%.
[0]: http://blog.interviewing.io/after-a-lot-more-data-technical-interview-performance-really-is-kind-of-arbitrary/ http://blog.interviewing.io/after-a-lot-more-data-technical-...
[1]: http://blog.alinelerner.com/people-cant-gauge-their-own-interview-performance-and-that-makes-them-harder-to-hire/ http://blog.alinelerner.com/people-cant-gauge-their-own-inte...
- andreareina 7y ago> I'm one of four people I know of who fails interviews at a high enough rate that I could fail 20 in a row (and I believe I have). My reading of that is that out of all the people he knows, there are four that could plausibly "fail" 20 interviews in a row, not that 25% of (engineers?) he knows would do so.