4 ms·
I think, the problem is deeper than just watching TV. The real question is what activities does it replace. 3.5 hours per day is a a significant portion of one'
by john_moscow 7y ago
I think, the problem is deeper than just watching TV. The real question is what activities does it replace. 3.5 hours per day is a a significant portion of one's day, if you subtract sleep, food, shopping, doctor visits and other basic needs.
I wouldn't be surprised if those who watch less TV fill that time with creative hobbies, socialization, reading of thought-provoking books, etc. As a matter of fact, I would love to see a paper trying to structure those activities and correlate the prevalent groups to the cognitive performance.
- friendlybus 7y agoRoald Dahl the famous writer used to love reading news and the like, saying he could do it all day. This problem has likely been around for a long time. I'd be curious what people do in cultures without the drip feed and their reaction to it.