3 ms·
We explicitly specified Menlo in the new release, because it is rather unambiguous (and monospace). I don't really understand your criticism.
by phoerious 7y ago
We explicitly specified Menlo in the new release, because it is rather unambiguous (and monospace). I don't really understand your criticism.
- Jon_Lowtek 7y ago> I don't really understand your criticism. I think i understand what this is about. It starts with this code (inlined for brevity) > QFont passwordFont = QFontDatabase::systemFont(QFontDatabase::FixedFont); and this distinction of characteristics > "fixed" and "unambiguous" are different things (note: there is no QFontDatabase::UnambiguousFont) and an actual bug somewhere else as the root cause > broken in lubuntu 17.10: resulting font was neither fixed nor unambiguous. which finally resulted in: > this kind of utility needs the option to specify a specific font but things got heated between "not a bug: fix your system" and "this utility can be improved" ending in personal insults and everyone being annoyed by each other despite showing great love for the application (just foss things)