4 ms·
I really don't know. What are you two talking about?
by sfkdjf9j3j 7y ago
I really don't know. What are you two talking about?
- netsharc 7y agoI think they're hinting it's arson by people who hate Christianity (i.e. Islamic extremists), but authorities are covering it up because publishing that "truth" would cause a religious civil war (national security danger), and they also can't write that "truth" here because they'll be downvoted (oh the horrors, downvotes!!). It's fucking disgusting how cowardly these couple of commenters are, but also how many seems to have showed up on this thread.
- microcolonel 7y agoNot saying I can't say that here. Just keeping with the style of the report here. I mean, I don't think I'm obscuring anything, literally mentioning arson in the next breath. I just had the one comment, I don't spend my lonely hours refreshing the threads page on HN, waiting for people to complain about the way something is said rather than addressing it. Who cares who is "cowardly" for not writing everything purely literally? Given that the incentives are there, and the most important part of a root cause analysis, the root cause, is missing, what makes you think it isn't the one thing they have an interest in obscuring? I mean, I basically yelled arson, how much am I obscuring? > (i.e. Islamic extremists) The French media I've seen have also relayed concern about radical feminisim, generic black bloc communism, or other ideologies with extreme elements.