>that smokers cost the company a lot more than non-smokers Does it though? Smokers typically don't get ill affects until later in life / retirement, at which p

>that smokers cost the company a lot more than non-smokers Does it though? Smokers typically don't get ill affects until later in life / retirement, at which point companies don't pay insurance. Sounds more like typical Puritanical BS. Maybe they're just trying to get some free brand promotion.