The first one is trivially true because of the word 'might' The second one I think is true and an extremely elegant solution for a bizarre neurological phenome

The first one is trivially true because of the word 'might' The second one I think is true and an extremely elegant solution for a bizarre neurological phenomena. And critiquing Ramachandran's neurology on the basis of an epistemology ignorant of neuroscience seems a lot like critiquing Newton's physics on the basis of an astrology ignorant of astronomy. (this is hard for me to admit, my training is as a philosopher).