> You're quibbling over semantics. Not at all. He’s accurately reflecting gun laws and car laws. You are willfully hand waving the fact that cars are entirely

> You're quibbling over semantics. Not at all. He’s accurately reflecting gun laws and car laws. You are willfully hand waving the fact that cars are entirely unregulated except for use on public roads. As where guns are regulated in every facet of their existence. You are doing this because you read on a liberal site and heard the liberal talking points that guns are easier to get than a car with is wrong. It’s not semantic, your argument is invalid.