3 ms·
Enjoy - https://gist.github.com/817556 https://gist.github.com/817556
by mbthomas 16y ago
Enjoy - https://gist.github.com/817556 https://gist.github.com/817556
- deleted 16y ago[deleted]
- lfborjas 16y agonice!
- kenjackson 16y agoIn fairness to the Java version, you should probably add all the additional stuff. using System.Linq; class Filter { static void Main() { var a = new []{1, 2, 3, 4}.Where(x=>x%2==0); System.Console.WriteLine(a); } } It's unclear if printing is necessary or not, as the Java one does an explicit print, but the others don't.
- lfborjas 16y agoThe other ones are meant to be run in a REPL, but java doesn't have one (lest you count beanshell, which ships with a really old version of java, one before generics) so I had to print it explicitly
- nrkn 16y agousing System.Linq; class F { static void Main() { new[] {1, 2, 3, 4}.Where( i => i % 2 > 0 ).ToList().ForEach( System.Console.WriteLine ); } }
- TeHCrAzY 16y agoIt's always irritated me that ForEach isn't available on IEnumerable<T>