This sounds the the classical "intelligence being something people have". It is futile to talk about 100% correctness in this field > ... machine which hasn'

This sounds the the classical "intelligence being something people have". It is futile to talk about 100% correctness in this field > ... machine which hasn't even the slightest semblance of a shared cultural context ... Why is this universally true? > ... it would likely be trained on a small subset of human cultures and would produce varying results. As it has when you travel to foreign countries. There is not such hing as understanding artificial intelligence. There is a task of understanding _intelligence_ and attempting to implement it without giving birth.