4 ms·
No it doesn't. When a humam gets wronged by what "is" they can likely feel or imagine a better "ought".
by Iolaum 7y ago
No it doesn't. When a humam gets wronged by what "is" they can likely feel or imagine a better "ought".
- jmmcd 7y agoThey can feel or imagine an "ought", but the point of Hume is that they can't argue for it.
- goatlover 7y agoAnd yet humans do, all the time. It's similar to Hume's attack on causality. You can't show that A caused B, but yet we all act like it's the case, when B always follows A. Kant's critique comes next.
- naveen99 7y agoYou don’t think an machines can learn to classify situations as good or bad for them ?