4 ms·
The savings are in RAM costs due to ELK stack basically not running under 4GB. And larger logs with stack trace are much slower compared to Loki. There's a reas
by tmikaeld 7y ago
The savings are in RAM costs due to ELK stack basically not running under 4GB. And larger logs with stack trace are much slower compared to Loki. There's a reason there is no cheap ELK services.