4 ms·
I am fine with NATs! I think is a good compromise between security and connectivity. If two users want to connect they have to explicitly do NAT traversal. 'IP
by Sean-Der 7y ago
I am fine with NATs! I think is a good compromise between security and connectivity. If two users want to connect they have to explicitly do NAT traversal.
'IP Leaking' was fixed with mDNS candidates [0]
[0] https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-rtcweb-mdns-ice-candidates-04 https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-rtcweb-mdns-ice-candi...
- lightedman 7y agoWasn't mDNS designed for small networks like intranets, not the whole internet? I'm reading a discussion on Google where in the comments it is mentioned that you can still obtain IP addresses even with mDNS enabled if you're allowing video and audio with a specific flag set (again with the configuration implementation.) https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/discuss-webrtc/6stQXi72BEU https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/discuss-webrtc/6stQX...