"The contracts were filled with “dense and ambiguous language,” including one 140-word paragraph that Enright called “a grammatical labarynth.” The contract cov

"The contracts were filled with “dense and ambiguous language,” including one 140-word paragraph that Enright called “a grammatical labarynth.” The contract covers “photographs, pictures or portraits” and printed material. “It does not, however, mention GirlsDoPorn.com, nor the words ‘internet,’ ‘online,’ or ‘website,’” Enright wrote. “It is thus designed to obscure what will actually be done with the videos and to encourage continued reliance on defendants’ repeated representations, promises, and testimonials from hired ‘references.’”" https://www.law.com/therecorder/2020/01/02/girlsdoporn-faces-12-8m-verdict-for-duping-models/?slreturn=20200003222356 https://www.law.com/therecorder/2020/01/02/girlsdoporn-faces...