3 ms·
i think that's a valid take, but i have the inkling that One Medical is prioritizing making the most common use case (just going in to see a doc for a temporary
by kbar13 7y ago
i think that's a valid take, but i have the inkling that One Medical is prioritizing making the most common use case (just going in to see a doc for a temporary ailment) as great as possible. likely this is one of those things where you might be better served by another company that's targeting your use case?
- dcow 7y agoI think it’s more that I’ve had better, more attentive, care without the $200/yr (and certainly not 1800-30k/yr as the sibling comment suggests). But that was when I lived in the less dense Midwest. Personally I’m fine and I take time to research and followup myself if needed. I’ve seen friends struggle to make sense of their own health and because they didn’t get a followup weren’t aware they needed to continually monitor or schedule specialist visits etc. It makes sense to me if they need to prioritize other things first. I hope that one of the advancements they can make is better management of cases because technology should make that possible.