4 ms·
This is a confusing and boring take. A) You have to trust third parties. B) It's boring to point out what Google has killed. But when you look at that list th
by brunoTbear 7y ago
This is a confusing and boring take.
A) You have to trust third parties.
B) It's boring to point out what Google has killed. But when you look at that list there's nothing as substantial as ChromeOS.
Finally, ChromeOS is incredibly widely used internally, and is a revenue generating product in the Chromebook family sold to enterprises alongside Cloud products. It is not an area where Google is going to capitulate or kill without a sufficiently long runway and carefully considered EOL plan.
Disclosure: am Googler. Am tired of half-considered takes on Google.
- heavenlyblue 7y agoWhat’s the margin vs Google’s ad business?
- Analemma_ 7y ago> But when you look at that list there's nothing as substantial as ChromeOS. Google+ got way, way more investment than ChromeOS and was considered a top priority at the C-level. Still killed.
- gowld 7y agoThe context of this thread is Enterprise, where G+ was not killed.
- signal11 7y agoIn the enterprise context, I guess the Google Search Appliance would be a good example. Before you say "it wasn't widely used" -- that's probably why it was killed. Google customers who use a product that doesn't lead its market and/or make megabucks should be worried. We know there are other products that are failing to gain traction in the marketplace -- like GCP. While I'm not saying GCP will meet Search Appliance's fate, it has already been reported[1] that there will be financial consequences if GCP is unable to get a #2 position in the cloud marketplace by 2023. [1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21815260 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21815260