3 ms·
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proof_by_assertion https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proof_by_assertion
by BubRoss 7y ago
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proof_by_assertion https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proof_by_assertion
- deleted 7y ago[deleted]
- ncmncm 7y agoProof by Wikipedia link does not even make the list of fallacies. 2015, Gordon Moore: "I see Moore's law dying here in the next decade or so." <http://spectrum.ieee.org/computing/hardware/gordon-moore-the-man-whose-name-means-progress> http://spectrum.ieee.org/computing/hardware/gordon-moore-the... Brian Krzanich, the former CEO of Intel: "Our cadence today is closer to two and a half years than two." <https://blogs.wsj.com/digits/2015/07/16/intel-rechisels-the-tablet-on-moores-law/> https://blogs.wsj.com/digits/2015/07/16/intel-rechisels-the-... John L. Hennessy; David A. Patterson (June 4, 2018): "The ending of Dennard Scaling and Moore’s Law also slowed this path; single core performance improved only 3% last year!" <https://iscaconf.org/isca2018/turing_lecture.html> https://iscaconf.org/isca2018/turing_lecture.html>
- BubRoss 7y agoYou didn't confront anything I linked. Again, Moore's law is about transistor density, which hasn't stopped yet and has gone into to more cores. It was never about single core performance. Now it seems like you are including dennard scaling after someone else mentioned it. You have a quote about the time frame increasing which has never been disputed either. I'm sure you can find links to some tech blogs that have the same misunderstandings as you do, why don't you go hunt those down too?