4 ms·
> The two should be facing exactly the same pressure from Amazon, so the reasons for Fry's failures has to be more nuanced than "internet retailers are sucking
by danans 7y ago
> The two should be facing exactly the same pressure from Amazon, so the reasons for Fry's failures has to be more nuanced than "internet retailers are sucking everyone dry."
One possibility is that Fry's didn't focus enough on it's core competency: computer components for enthusiasts. Last I was there they were selling a bunch of very tangentially related things, like a lot of kids toys.
That's the kind of stuff that nobody really cares so much about seeing before they but them, so easy for online retailers to serve.
Seems like many successful post Amazon businesses focus on a particular niche. Of course, I imagine that with their huge retail buildings, Fry's had to fill them with something to justify the cost of that space.
Retailers are just as much selling an experience as they are selling goods. The novelty of the Fry's experience just wore off for most people. Believe it or not there was a time when people would take their families there all weekend long as an outing.
People just aren't as impressed with consumer technology now as they were then ... and they're sort of right. The changes in recent years haven't been that wonder-inducing from a consumer perspective.
- deleted 7y ago[deleted]
- jcranmer 7y agoI've seen mention of what may be one of the biggest differences between Microcenter and Fry's. Fry's stores are absolutely massive--well over 100k sq ft, similar in size to a Walmart. Microcenter is generally running 20-40k sq ft, closer to a Hobby Lobby or Michael's in size. (And I'm comparing stores in the few urban areas that have both, so it's not an issue of land availability). It always felt to me that Microcenter was rather a large store, but that Fry's being so much larger leaves me somewhat perplexed as to what the hell they filled it with.