3 ms·
.. and the doctors he talked to felt they already had the knowledge they needed! If anything, they felt, perhaps, that this devalued their existing knowledge. A
by rconti 7y ago
.. and the doctors he talked to felt they already had the knowledge they needed! If anything, they felt, perhaps, that this devalued their existing knowledge. And they don't make 10% more money for providing 10% better outcomes.
- larkost 7y agoThis is probably the root of the problems in US medicine: there is no effective feedback. The ACA (Obamacare) did a little work on this with Medicare payments to hospitals, but that is an exception in the system. What could we do to make this the basis of the system? Without driving doctors away from patients who have bad prognocices?
- ghayes 7y agoTake a look at HMOs, such as Kaiser Permanente. HMOs combine the function of insurers and medical providers in a way that aligns incentives (everyone pays about the same, but healthier people need less care and are thus more profitable customers). There are many problems that come with the HMO model (e.g. the potential for low quality care), but when it works, it directly solves the problem you addressed and exists in the US.