The "highest and best use" being those with enough money to afford it? This is just the neo-liberal mantra of "the markets are always right". That's fine when

The "highest and best use" being those with enough money to afford it? This is just the neo-liberal mantra of "the markets are always right". That's fine when it's just rich people playing with their spare change. But when markets impact the whole of society it becomes a moral problem, currently we are letting city traders and investors make moral decisions for entire nations.